Mattu's case debated in Commons - Jul 29 2004

Coventry Observer

A HEALTH Minister has shattered hopes of reinstating suspended heart specialist Dr Raj Mattu while he awaits a disciplinary hearing next year.

During an adjournment debate in the House of Commons last Wednesday (July 21) Coventry South MP Jim Cunningham and Coventry North West MP Geoffrey Robinson asked for Dr Raj Mattu to be reinstated.

But the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Health Dr Stephen Ladyman said the allegations against him were too serious.

Dr Mattu was suspended amid allegations of bullying in February 2002 and will not face a disciplinary hearing until January 2005 - sending the cost of his suspension to the NHS to over £1 million.

“The trust has been keeping this case under review and is satisfied that the grounds remain for keeping the suspension in place,” Dr Ladyman told the House.

But Mr Cunningham launched a scathing attack on the credibility of the lengthy suspension and called into question the reasons for it.

“There is something fundamentally wrong with a system that has no time for the resolution of cases such as Dr Mattu's,” he said.

But Mr Ladyman said the hospital could not be blamed for the delays and criticised Dr Mattu and his supporters for fighting a campaign through the media.

“It is their right to do so, but in doing so they have tied up resources at the trust that could have otherwise have been used to deal more expeditiously with the case.”

This was met with an outburst from South Norfolk MP, Richard Bacon, who said: “Who wrote this rubbish?”

The debate, which lasted for half an hour, also heard the views of Geoffrey Robinson, who was concerned about the trust's involvement in the case.

“To my knowledge, it is the chairman [Brian Stoten] and chief executive [David Roberts] who seem to be leading the campaign against Dr Mattu,” he said.

He was referring to a court case eight years ago involving Dr Mattu which resulted in his acquittal.

Speaking to The Observer this week, Dr Mattu said: “I am astonished the trust have brought this matter up as it was concluded eight years ago.

“The people of Coventry will reach their own view as to why the trust has chosen to drag this up in such a public way.”

A spokesman for the trust said the information had been sent to them by a member of the public after Dr Mattu had made and appearance on Radio Four and was made public by Mr Robinson during the debate in the Commons.

“It is not a matter for the trust, and has no bearing on the disciplinary process underway," the spokesman added.

"It is disappointing for both Dr Mattu and the trust that Mr Robinson has chosen to make this a public matter.”

Back to other stories

 

 
 

 

 
For more information contact:

mail@drmrc.co.uk