Suspended surgeon's research fund frozen - Aug 28 2003

By Adrian Murphy, Coventry Observer

NEARLY £1.5 million of vital research funds secured by suspended Walsgrave Hospital heart surgeon Dr Raj Mattu have been frozen by health chiefs, it emerged this week.

Dr Mattu secured the cash from various sponsors, including the British Heart Foundation, to carry out pioneering research into genetics and heart disease at the University of Warwick.

But since his suspension from Walsgrave Hospital in February 2002 following allegations of bullying, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust has frozen the funds - leading to the break up of Dr Mattu’s 12 strong team of researchers.

Now it has emerged the trust has started to redistribute Dr Mattu’s funds to other doctors carrying out research, much to the anger of the suspended surgeon.

Details of the funds emerged during an employment tribunal brought by Dr Mattu’s research colleague Ted Needham, whose contract was not renewed by the university in May 2002 when the trust refused to hand over cash from the frozen fund.

Speaking exclusively to The Observer, Dr Mattu accused the trust of ruining ten years of research into heart disease.

He added the cash his research team had secured was now being distributed to other doctors without his consent.

“This is a scandalous act as myself and Ted have spent ten years on this research programme and secured these funds,” Dr Mattu said.

“To find out that money for wages and trials has not only been frozen but transferred to another account is unbelievable.”

Mr Needham, now unemployed, said he believed he had become caught in the middle of the dispute between the trust and Dr Mattu.

“It is atrocious that having spent over ten years in the field and compiling a valuable research programme this has happened,” Mr Needham added.

Mr Needham lost his case for unfair dismissal at the tribunal.

But in its report, the tribunal panel was critical of the trust’s role in the affair.

“The respondents (Warwick University) did everything they reasonably could to persuade the trust to commit themselves to releasing those funds, but the trust effectively refused to do so.

“We suspect the trust’s reason was directly connected with their suspension of Dr Mattu, although they were careful never to express that reason directly.

“Instead, they delayed and prevaricated, presumably hoping to minimise their problems.”

A spokesman for the trust said this week: “Funding for Mr Needham’s post was not frozen or affected by the suspension of Dr Mattu.

“Mr Needham had a two year honorary position with the university and we understand the tribunal has rejected his claim.”

Back to other stories

For more information contact: mail@drmrc.co.uk