| New jobs
shock for medical workers - Nov 17 2005
By Annette
Kinsella,
Coventry Evening Telegraph
MORE than 30 nursing and medical staff jobs may go at
Coventry's Walsgrave Hospital over the next 10 months.
The revelation comes in a draft copy of a staff
consultation document obtained by the Evening Telegraph.
The report, which has not yet been shown to staff,
states that the jobs of nurses and medical support staff are under threat
in several wards as part of the reorganisation of University Hospitals
Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust and the building of a new "super
hospital".
The Evening Telegraph revealed last week that up to 250
jobs could be lost across all departments. After initially stating that no
frontline medical staff would go, hospital bosses said that there would be
no "forced" redundancies among nursing teams.
The draft document details the numbers of nursing staff
under threat and also gives a breakdown of the loss of beds on M3, M5 and
Whitley wards, which deal with rehabilitation and intermediate care.
It states that the three wards currently include 68
beds which will be reduced to 52.
More than 30 staff whose jobs are affected - expected
to be those working on Whitley, M3 and M5 wards - will be offered the
chance to go for posts on the newly-structured wards, but could have to
undergo "competitive" interviews.
Unsuccessful applicants could be redeployed to George
Eliot Hospital in Nuneaton or the primary care trust.
The latest revelations have already sparked anger from
a trade union leader.
Today Bob
Storry, regional officer at the technical and
skilled employees' union Amicus, accused the hospital of acting
dishonestly and said he was anxious to meet managers face to face.
He said: "We still don't know what's happening. They
are putting out headlines saying 'it's not going to affect frontline
services' but now we find out it could be otherwise.
"It has been kept a secret, which will just frighten
staff."
Last week trust chief executive David Roberts said he
did not foresee forced redundancies in nursing.
He said: "As a course of last resort we may well choose
redundancies, but this would be a last port of call if we can't retrain or
redeploy.
"I would be disappointed if we were making large
numbers of people redundant."
Karen Pearce, of the Royal College of Nursing, said she
too was hoping to meet managers face to face to discuss the situation.
She said union members had not yet met with the
hospital's management team following the announcement of 250 job losses
last week.
Back to other stories
|